
At school the reformed group passed around a book on paedobaptism. After four others had read the book it was passed to me. Before reading this book I had not read anything in favor of infant baptism, only the opposing view. Bryan Chapell makes a clear explanation of the continuing Abrahamic Covenant. He explains that circumcision was a seal of the covenant that God had made with Abraham and prefigured the shedding of Christ's blood. After Christ died the New Testament believers received a new sign, baptism portrays what Christ accomplished on the cross, the washing away of our sin.
In the time of Abraham all the members of a household were baptized to symbolize the head of the house leading his family in the way of God. Circumcision did not indicate belief since it was applied before a child even had the ability to believe. If baptism is the new sign of the covenant then all of the Jews in the New Testament would automatically baptize all the members of their household because of the tradition that had been in place for many years.
I enjoyed reading the small book for its comprehensive way of presenting the information. I can understand why my parents do not hold to infant baptism, because of their dispensational holdings they view the Bible in a completely different manner.
As far as how I feel about it...I am considering it. I have been studying Galatians 3 and it is very clear that the believers of today are children of Abraham. Jesus Christ is the offspring.
"Know then that it is those of faith who are the sons of Abraham. And the Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the gospel beforehand to Abraham, saying, 'in you shall all the nations be blessed.' So then, those who are of faith are blessed along with Abraham, the man of faith."
~Galatians 3:7-9